Redevelopment Pitch
— PROJECT NAME
Redevelopment Plan:
The Downtown Toronto Railway Lands
— UofT Course Code
— DATE
December 2, 2024
Background: The Toronto Railway Lands is located in between Front Street and the Toronto Waterfront area. It is essentially a large railway yard and many people thought that this space was not being used to its full potential. In the summer of 2016, The Toronto Star reported that former Mayor John Tory and City Councillor Joe Cressy proposed a plan to redevelop the space and build a public park above the railway. Since Toronto was experiencing rapid population growth, planners and city officials realized that we didn’t have enough accessible green space for residents or for people visiting the city. The original plan was to promote a more active lifestyle and it was thought that this park would encourage people to go on more walks, play sports and ride their bikes out. However, the plan eventually did not go through due to financial challenges and they also didn’t have the air rights to build above the tracks.
Standing in front of the Toronto Railway Lands, a concrete canvas waiting for the city’s next vision and where Toronto’s past/future intersect.
Proposal: My alternative idea for the redesign of this area would be to build new transportation infrastructure above the railway tracks and also respect the original plans by incorporating some green spaces but on a smaller scale. For example, instead of one huge park, we could add street trees and gardens along the sides of the roads because in the original plan, the idea was to turn the whole area into a park, but just a street over, there’s already a massive park located on Fort York Blvd called Canoe Landing Park (pictured below).
Canoe Landing Park
Recommendations
I have five recommendations, the main things I would suggest are adding in one-way streets specifically for cars, incorporating a toll to help with construction costs, adding a two-way street for streetcars to help better connect CityPlace and Liberty Village more efficiently, create bike lanes and green spaces.
One-Way Streets for Cars
To start, one-way streets for cars would benefit high-traffic urban areas like this one as it will alleviate traffic congestion along Spadina Avenue and Lake Shore Blvd West during rush hour and help reduce overall commute times. For example, it would be much easier for drivers to navigate on a one-way street because they would remove the turns at intersections and reduce the number of encounters with turning vehicles, thus providing a faster and less disruptive traffic flow. If vehicles are moving in one direction, this would mean that these streets would experience less traffic because there would be “fewer stops-and-starts and higher speeds” (Boeing & Riggs, 2023, paragraph 6). This would be very convenient during rush hour for people who live outside of the city center because they would save time commuting home from work, which means less time is being wasted on the roads and this also means that you can spend more time with your family at home or prepare your own dinner instead of ordering takeout because you “have no time to cook” since you got home so late because of traffic. One-way streets can also dedicate more space for travel, meaning there would be more space on the street to drive on. If we could adopt this method, it may reduce the number of car accidents. For example, head-on collisions would be eliminated because you’re driving straight ahead, making it safer not just for the drivers but also for pedestrians and people cycling in this area. In addition, another benefit of one-way streets is that they can free up space for bike lanes and we can create wider sidewalks.
Toll Roads
Moreover, roads are capital-intensive and are expensive to build and maintain so in order to budget for the new roads, we can incorporate tolls. Adding a toll can help with the construction costs of building the roads. For example, before the year 2017, Golden Ears Bridge in Vancouver charged about $3.15 to cross the bridge with a regular-sized car and would charge even higher if one was driving a bigger vehicle like a truck. Tolls help to repay for the original construction costs of building the roads and help pay for any future road maintenance repairs and upgrades like adding in new asphalt. Another benefit of tolls is that instead of everyone being taxed to pay for the construction of the road, only the people using the roads will be charged to continue using them and for the future upkeep of the road. Therefore, people who aren’t using the service won’t have to pay for it. This will also help manage traffic flow. For example, we can divert some of the traffic coming from Spadina Avenue and Lake Shore Blvd West over to this new transportation infrastructure and people who are in a rush to go home and don’t mind paying the toll fee can take this path home. Paying for a toll route gives people the option to take a road less travelled by, they will be essentially paying for the convenience of getting to their destination sooner. By enforcing tolls, it may help discourage people from driving their cars because some may not want to pay the extra costs to use the toll road and may encourage them to take public transit instead which in turn will cut down on greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution because there will be fewer cars on the roads. This in turn will improve overall public health.
Two-Way Street for Streetcars
Another more feasible solution would be to add in a two-way street specifically designed for streetcars and to offer reduced fare prices. Decreasing streetcar fares may incentivize people to take public transit instead of driving a car because these paths will be exclusively for streetcars only and will experience less traffic and delays because they’re on a fixed route that has fixed stops and schedules. In comparison to cars and buses, streetcars are more efficient because they can carry more passengers, which means fewer vehicles will be taking up space on the roads. So, it’d be a good idea to add streetcars in this area because it’s located in a high-density, highly populated neighbourhood. Additionally, streetcars are more environmentally friendly and sustainable compared to cars because they are powered by electricity. Taking the streetcar and public transit in general is also much cheaper than owning a car. Plus, not everyone can drive, many people do not have a driver’s license. Streetcars can improve accessibility and help people with mobility issues travel from place to place as well. As for the designs of the streetcar, we will also add in similar features that the TTC currently uses, such as ramps that lower to make the streetcar more wheelchair accessible. We will make sure people can attach their bicycles to the front of the streetcar to improve user experience. As for the interior designs for the streetcar, removing the red fabric from the seats will allow for easier clean-ups. By doing this, it will help the seats become more visibly clear and show its riders possible signs of contracting any bed bugs. Something that I noticed at the streetcar stop near the Railway Lands on Front Street West and Spadina Avenue is that although there are streetcar shelters to protect its riders from harsh weather like rain and snow, there are no benches. For my proposed plan, we will make improvements to the streetcar stops by including benches so people can sit and wait comfortably while they wait for the streetcar to arrive.
Bike Lanes
Furthermore, we can promote active transportation by integrating a two-way bike lane and bicycle parking into this plan. The bike lanes will be separated from the roads with green space (trees and gardens) to avoid collisions with other vehicles. This will reduce the number of injuries and accidents that bikers may come across, such as getting hit by a moving car. Adding bike lanes will be beneficial to riders as it will increase their daily physical activity, which will then in turn have positive impacts on their health. We will also add in a Bike Share for those who do not own a bike (pictured below).
Example of Bike Share placement & what the two-way bike lanes will look like
Green Space
As the urban core of Toronto continues to experience population growth and becomes denser, incorporating more green spaces into this plan will be beneficial to residents as street trees can improve air quality by absorbing pollutants and reducing carbon dioxide in the air, Moseman calls them natural “carbon sinks." Green spaces can also help with mental health, reduce stress and improve concentration. Green spaces not only promote active transportation but they also stimulate economic activity. For example, this area does not only consist of residential space, but it also has lots of commercial spaces such as restaurants, stores and coffee shops and because of this, the local businesses near the proposed green spaces of this plan will experience increased foot traffic which in turn will bring in more money and increase sales revenue for those businesses. Furthermore, building aesthetically pleasing water fountains with pet bowls (like the one pictured below) for runners and people walking their dogs could be beneficial as people going out for jogs or walking their dogs will no longer have to carry heavy water bottles around with them.
Water Fountain with Pet Bowl Design from Volunteer Park Trust
Advantages
The bottom line is, is that there are many advantages to building this new transportation system above The Railway Lands. For example, its convenience, the combination of transportation modes will connect CityPlace and Liberty Village more efficiently, as well as alleviate traffic congestion along Spadina Avenue and Lake Shore Blvd West during peak hours. It will also benefit the residents who live in the surrounding neighbourhood, as living near public transit can help increase the value of their condo units. Reyna at REMAX stated that living within a 10-minute walk from public transit can increase property values by up to 30%. On top of that, building these multiple modes of transportation will promote population growth and provide economic opportunities by creating jobs in the construction and manufacturing sectors. Lastly, approving this transportation solution plan will, most importantly, help reduce overall commute times.
Potential Barriers
Some possible barriers to implementing my proposed transportation plan include challenges in changing behaviours. Even with positive enforcement like advertising cycling as a good way to lose weight, implementing one-way streets and encouraging the use of public transit, people may still prefer to drive over taking public transit or active travel due to Canada’s cold climate and uncertain weather forecasts. Cost-wise, it also may be difficult to reduce/subsidize streetcar fares in this area if the surrounding streetcars in this location remain at $3.30 per ride. However, for the toll route road, a possible solution to make it more affordable to use could be adjusting the costs/lowering the toll during rush hour and increasing the price back up to its regular fee during off-peak hours. By fluctuating the toll, it may make the one-way streets more accessible to use.
Retail Supply Report
— PROJECT NAME
Retail Supply Report
— UofT Course Code
— DATE
October 3, 2024
This report will compare and contrast The Well Lower Ground (ancillary retail) and St. Clair Avenue West (retail strip) by their location, accessibility, market orientation, degree of specialty, design and composition of retail, whether they are controlled or managed environments, planned or unplanned and whether they are public or private spaces. Lastly, this report will examine whether ancillary retail or retail strips would suffer the most from a post-pandemic hybrid model and if an in-person field exploration of the retail areas be better to gather information on this study.
The Well (Lower Level)
St. Clair Avenue West east from Lansdowne Avenue
Location
The Well is located in downtown Toronto where high-density condos are present. The Well is also surrounded by a plethora of not just luxury condo buildings but also office spaces and high-end restaurants on Wellington and King Street West. This area can also be considered a tourist destination as it is near tourist attractions such as the Rogers Centre and CN Tower. On the other hand, the St. Clair Avenue West retail strip is located near Deer Park.
Accessibility
From the information I have collected, The Well has public transit, they specifically have a streetcar available on Front Street which helps promote the mall’s visibility. For example, there are many office spaces nearby so after work hours, The Well experiences a lot of traffic from 9 to 5ers looking to buy dinner. Also because The Well is near tourist attractions means that they have a large tourist market as well. They also have bike rings and bike share parking and although they do not offer free parking, they do have paid underground parking. The Well is also near The Gardiner Expressway which makes it highly accessible for people to get to who live in other parts of the city. Just like The Well, St. Clair Avenue West also has public transit available. St. Clair Avenue West has a streetcar and they have paid street parking. In terms of accessibility, both locations have good access to public transportation systems.
Market Orientation
How the two retail areas differ in their target markets is that The Well aims to target and attract high-income working individuals. For example, they are catering to this demographic with the nature of their stores selling products with higher price tags and the furniture and finishes they have appear to be more upscale and visually appealing to the eyes. Not to mention, this ancillary retail is located in downtown Toronto where the average rent prices and median income are higher, so this indicates that higher-income individuals live here. Whereas St. Clair serves lower-income communities. Based on observation, St. Clair has immigration and financial services available which may indicate a lower-income population. They also have a mental health facility which may indicate that many people are struggling in this specific area.
Degree of Speciality
The Well has a low specialty as the lower level mostly contains retail chains. The reason behind this is that developers prefer retail chains over independent retail. Developers want customers to have a familiar feeling when entering these stores/fast food restaurants because they know what they’re going to get. Retail chains will usually have a uniform aesthetic to their other chain locations. This is a way to draw in customers because it is familiar and predictable to them. For example, The Well has a Chatime that has a distinct look and feel to them and if you visit any of their other locations, it looks identical to the one they have at The Well. Chains also have less competition because they are already established and well-known to the public so they don’t have to market themselves as much because people are already familiar with their branding. Well-known stores like Lululemon, Sephora and Structube create more foot traffic to The Well because they have higher market presence and with that means they also have higher purchasing power. On the other hand, St. Clair Avenue West has a high specialty because they differ in strategy as their retail strip mostly comprises of independent stores. Although St. Clair Avenue West is dominated by independent local mom-and-pop shops that have a limited advertising budget, independent stores’ strength is that they can get to know local customers on a more personal level which is good in the long term because those people may end up becoming loyal customers because they created a personal connection there.
Design and Composition of Retail
Based on observation, The Well is a mixed-use building that is composed of a mix of office and commercial space as well as residential condo units. Their design is modern and they included high-end finishes to this vertically built tall building. This building has everything you possibly need in one place. It incentivizes people to not leave the vicinity as it contains everything you need already like a grocery store, doctor’s office, dentist, gym, hair salon, nail salon, furniture store, clothing stores, expensive restaurants and food court and all these spots are either connected by bridges or elevators/escalators. Their slogan is literally “Eat, Shop, Work, Live and Play in Downtown Toronto.” The Well designed its food court as a high-end food court by advertising its fast food as “gourmet grab and go” and the developers made sure to cluster fancy fast-food services that focus on immediate consumption together so it would encourage people to consume their food faster and they could resume shopping. As for St. Clair, the various independent retailers operating their small businesses may have had a lower budget for designing the exterior of their storefronts as many of their designs looked outdated. Also, all the stores were one to two stories high which may be easier for shoppers’ mobility.
Controlled and Managed Environments
The Well is a controlled environment and this outdoor mall tries to control the customer’s movements. For example, The Well has strategically placed BMO (a bank) at the entrance. Swales calls this “the lobster trap." They do this so shoppers can withdraw money before they start their shopping spree. The whole point of the lobster trap is to manipulate the direction of where shoppers will go. They purposefully place the bigger stores at the front because those stores usually generate the most traffic and then in turn the small stores in the middle will ultimately benefit from all the traffic from the bigger stores. Moreover, St. Clair is a managed environment that has a concentration of independent retail businesses.
Planned and Unplanned Retail
The Well is planned retail as it is mostly enclosed spaces. Although, unlike a traditional mall that is within an entirely enclosed space, The Well changes the experience of a traditional mall by introducing an outdoor shopping mall concept. It’s still within an enclosed space but they added features like the ceiling being open which lets in natural sunlight. It is also located in a mixed-use building which houses office space as well as residential condo units. The Well is located on Front Street West which gets a lot of exposure due to high pedestrian foot traffic. By contrast, St. Clair Avenue West is unplanned retail as it sits beside a busy street located in a large urban area. Unplanned retail strips are basically when a bunch of independent stores decide to open storefronts on the same side of the street.
Public and Private Spaces
St. Clair Avenue West is a public space and has public services such as a mental health facility and church available for its community. They also offer public street parking. Whereas The Well is a private space that has privately owned stores, paid underground parking and public transport located outside of the vicinity.
Conclusion
An in-person field exploration of the retail areas would be better than a virtual one as there are many limitations to Internet research. For example, on Google Maps, The Well is still under construction whereas today, it is pretty much completed. Moreover, if there was a post-pandemic hybrid work model, ancillary retail would be the most likely to suffer. For example, ancillary retail spots like The Well’s lower ground are in the bottom part of a mixed-use building and feel congested during rush hour because people are shoulder to shoulder when eating at the food court. In addition, the upper level of The Well is connected by bridges and would not be suitable for a pandemic because there is not a lot of space for social distancing on these bridges. Swales also highlighted in Chapter 10 that during COVID-19, most of downtown was a ghost town. This was because the people who were commuting downtown for work no longer needed to be in the office and many people who lived in downtown temporarily moved to other places because they worked remotely and could work from anywhere. Another example is when COVID-19 happened, more people were promoting small businesses/retail strips by telling others to “shop local.” Also, retail strips like the one on St. Clair Avenue are located on an open street space and offer outdoor restaurant patio seating which would make people more comfortable to eat at because it is in an outdoor setting where you can breathe in open fresh air rather than breathing air in an enclosed space and for those that do not want to eat out, retail strips also provide curbside pickup which makes it even more better for no contact delivery because the delivery driver is interacting with less people.
— PROJECT NAME
Market Demand Analysis
— UofT Course Code
— DATE
November 7, 2024
This is a comprehensive analysis that addresses market demands in census tract neighbourhoods in the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area (CMA). This report presents demographic data on two census tracts. I compare and contrast the two census tract neighbourhoods and explore their geodemographic applications.
How are the variables from the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) related?
Variables like education and income are closely related, which in turn affects consumption patterns as well as household sizes. From the data I have collected, Census Tract I (5350086.00) is located in the Rosedale neighbourhood and Census Tract II (5350307.04) is in the North York community. The Toronto Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) displays variables such as age, sex, education, average household income and marital status. These types of variables play an important role in figuring out different market areas and the demand for goods and services. It was noticeable that the variables of Census Tract I and Census Tract II differed. For example, the Census Tract II has a growing population at an increase of 12.1% from the years 2011-2016, whereas the Census Tract I population saw a slight -0.7% decrease in their population growth. A declining population can change consumption patterns as demand lowers because there are fewer people to service.
In terms of population by major age groups, Census Tract I had a higher number of children from the ages 0-14 years and 65+ years, while Census Tract II displayed a higher number of people from the ages 15-64 years of age. This is important as demographics affect the market demand. Different generations/age groups will need different types of goods and services, they affect what types of businesses will open in certain areas and the types of products and services that will be provided in the said area as “many organizations will be interested in not just who they are but where they are. Retailer: what is our target market and where will we find them” (Swales, 2022, Chapter 8). For example, Census Tract I has a higher population of people who are 65 years and older compared to Census Tract II and since the Census Tract I’s population consists of more elderly folk, it may indicate that this certain demographic may have a higher retiree population that needs more medical assistance services and hospitals. Therefore, population changes stemming from shifting lifecycle stages can impact consumption patterns.
To what extent do the variables combine together to produce a distinctive market area?
Variables such as education and income combine together to produce distinctive market areas. For example, higher levels of education pursued usually produce high-earning professionals which then lead to a higher median income. Whereas it is the opposite for those who do not have a degree, diploma or certificate. Highly educated, high-income individuals reside in the Census Tract I neighbourhood which means they can afford an upper-class lifestyle as they have high consumption patterns because they have more disposable income than those living in Census Tract II. Having more disposable income means you can consume more/purchase more goods, “not just in quantity, but quality—not just routine goods, but luxury goods. Upscale automobiles and homes” (Swales, 2022, Chapter 8). Affluent households have been a target market for retailers as high-income households spend more money on goods and services, which helps businesses generate profit, “a retailer would have to attract more than three lower-income households to match the spending power of a single high-income household” (Swales, 2022, Chapter 8). Another advantage that these high-income earners have is that they have access to more resources, which in turn can be beneficial for their health. For example, high-earning individuals typically have health and dental insurance and “will generally be less exposed to environmental pollution” (Swales, 2022, Chapter 8).
The average household income for Census Tract I is $419,676. Whereas Census Tract II’s average household income is significantly at $43,861. The variables differ for both Census Tracts may be due to education differences. In addition, there was a 32.3% prevalence of low-income people in Census Tract II, while on the other hand, only 6.4% of Census Tract I’s population was considered to be low-income.
Identifying variables from each neighbourhood that are distinctive:
Chosen Variables: Married vs. Not Married (which then correlates to One-Person Households vs. Large Traditional Family Sizes)
It is worth noting that there are almost 4x more unmarried people living in Census Tract II compared to CensusTract I. This is important data as couples in Census Tract II are not having nearly as many kids as those in Census Tract I. This may be a sign of socio-economic challenges. It may mean that these couples located in Census Tract II don’t have the means to raise kids, so they are having fewer babies. In contrast, couples Census Tract I are producing more children which may indicate that they have the resources to afford to raise children.
Based on observation, Census Tract II has a higher number of one-person households, which far exceeds Census Tract I. Census Tract II is a highly dense area consisting of 35.9% of one-person households. In contrast, only 15.2% are one-person households in
Census Tract I, which is less than half compared to Census Tract II and “one-person households are growing at the expense of traditional large family households with important implications for consumption” (Swales, 2022, Chapter 7). For example, one-person households are moving into tiny condos, which means they don’t need to buy as much décor or furniture. In comparison, traditional four-member households have different shopping habits and do not share the same consumption patterns as a one-person household, large family households typically spend a lot more and tend to be the “golden market household” for retailers because “couples with children have high levels of spending and in recent decades has been an important commercial target market” (Swales, 2022, Chapter 8).
Transportation to work varied for both Census Tracts. For example, Census Tract I showed that 58.5% of residents chose to drive vehicles as their main mode of transportation and only 27.5% took public transit. Whereas, in Census Tract II 52.1% of the population’s main mode of commuting was by public transit and only 32.5% were driving cars to work. This is important to note because, in Census Tract I, more than half of the population were driving either a car, truck or van to work. This may indicate wealthy/affluent people reside here if they can afford to pay for gas and drive a luxury vehicle to work. Furthermore, this is an “indication of the level of mobility and transportation options available to a population… Greater mobility reflects more access to goods and services” (Swales, 2022, Chapter 8). In contrast, it costs less to purchase a transit pass than to buy a car and drive said car on a highway that charges you a toll. However, it is important to note that commuting through public transit usually takes longer to get to one’s destination and that “dependence on public transit generally produces less flexible mobility and fewer destination options than the use of an automobile” (Swales, 2022, Chapter 7).
Geodemographics
My Descriptor of CityPlace
CityPlace is a high-density neighbourhood full of high-rise condo developments located in the south end of downtown Toronto. It is steps away from the Rogers Centre and CN Tower. The demographic here is young working professionals hustling and bustling through the city. It is vibrant as it is in close proximity to King Street West, which is known to be an entertainment hub and is where you can catch half of CityPlace residents dining in after a long day at work and the other half running through the waterfront area. This neighbourhood boasts green spaces like Canoe Landing Park and has public art on display underneath at The Bentway. CityPlace has close access to Union Station and The Gardiner Expressway.
From the information I have gathered, something that my findings for my Census Tract areas and descriptors from PRIZM have in common is that both seem to agree that Census Tract I were wealthy neighborhoods that have educated high-earning residents. Another similarity I found is that both PRIZM and my findings about Census Tract I being composed of mostly families and Census Tract II being mostly comprised of singles. Something that was contradictory was the average household incomes differed on PRIZM, for Census Tract II it displays an average household income of $121,766 whereas on the CMA it was $43,861. However, the average income for Census Tract I was relatively the same, both PRIZM and CMA were in the $400,000+ range.
The PRIZM description under the “how they live” section had similar recreational interests to what I wrote for my neighbourhood. In my descriptor, I wrote that the residents in CityPlace like to dine on King Street West after work or go for runs by the waterfront area and similarly, on PRIZM, they wrote that the residents like to go out to restaurants and enjoy leisure activities such as marathons. Something I forgot to add to my descriptor was how the demographic here has a diverse ethnic composition, but it is stated on the PRIZM website under the ”who they are” section. Another similarity I found was both mentioned how the neighbourhood is jam-packed with high-rise apartment condos and that the majority of the residents living here are young working professionals. Something PRIZM also mentioned that I forgot to add was that many of the people living in this area enjoy taking fitness classes (ex. mat pilates, yoga, spin and box hiit). As a result, many people who reside in this specific location like to also eat clean and have a overall healthy diet.
CityPlace Description from PRIZM